Home/ Insights/ Engineers

Indoor localization: why warehouses and factories are harder than they look

Indoor environments look controlled. Bounded space, no weather, predictable operating conditions. Teams frequently underestimate them during the design phase and discover the actual difficulty at deployment. The problem is not any single failure mode; it is that indoor environments combine several of them simultaneously.

The geometry problem is the first one. A warehouse aisle may run 200 meters with identical rack geometry on both sides at regular intervals. Every section looks like every other section. A localization system that relies on extracting distinctive features from the environment finds very few of them. It has no reliable way to distinguish position 40 meters from the entrance from position 140 meters from the entrance.

Dynamic elements compound the geometry problem. Forklifts reposition pallets continuously during operating hours. People walk through scenes. Vehicles enter and leave loading areas. A system that incorporates moving objects into its reference map is corrupting its own ground truth. The internal representation of the environment drifts from reality, and localization errors follow.

The transition problem appears at the facility boundary. At loading docks, the vehicle moves between GPS-available outdoor space and GPS-denied interior, often multiple times per shift. Any system that relies on GPS as a position anchor must handle this transition without losing consistency.

If your deployment involves any combination of repetitive geometry, dynamic traffic, and indoor-outdoor transitions, we can walk through what to expect technically before you commit to an approach.

Book a demo →
← Demos Next: Dynamic objects →